Hondata

Will increasing these tables closer to 0, cos they're negative values. free up more power/hit closer to desired values on "tuned" tables like throttle torque,AirC%, ignition & PA#tables?

The minimum efficiency table was added for a specific request by someone; so we do not have full understanding of that table.

touge tom wrote: Sat Nov 01, 2025 12:37 pm Will increasing these tables closer to 0, cos they're negative values. free up more power/hit closer to desired values on "tuned" tables like throttle torque,AirC%, ignition & PA#tables?

I have played with such table and have not seen any noticeable changes in behavior from the car from editing it....

Now, based on your comment, i am assuming your hitting some ceiling on the car, which i am betting its related to the TQ model.
Check some logs and you will likely see airc_max channel reducing on higher rpms, and or act_trq reaching trq_req during any of the events your experiencing.
If so, just a matter of tuning other tables to give yourself some headroom.

I'm guessing that raising the nominal charge table at 100% column where I need it will raise the ceiling?

which ceiling are you trying to raise?

It's all good my brother I figured it out it turned out that my pressure atmospheric tables were too low I was topping out at 3.53 PA all I needed was a 4.08 to hit my Target ends to raise the kmfirl table in column 99